Why Are Some People Better at Recognising Faces Than Others?

نویسندگان

چکیده

Imagine you lose sight of your friends (or parents) for a moment while are out at the park. You glance around and then spot them in distance. easily pick from all other people park correctly identify them. This process is called familiar face recognition. For most us, this seems easy generally good recognising faces. However, few really struggle to recognise Other “super-recognisers” who have an extraordinary ability faces very accurately. How faces? In article, we outline why some better worse) explore possible importance brain differences, mental processes, personality ability.

برای دانلود باید عضویت طلایی داشته باشید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Widgets: why are some interventions better than others?

the broader context of service provision, it is important that this does not race ahead of clear prescribing policies, underpinned by pharmocoeconomic considerations. We agree with the respondents that since buprenorphine is more expensive than methadone, the pharmocoeconomic aspects of prescribing need rigorous investigation. Whilst the studies they cite provide preliminary evidence of equipoi...

متن کامل

Some Multiobjective Optimizers are Better than Others

The No-Free-Lunch (NFL) theorems hold for general multiobjective fitness spaces, in the sense that, over a space of problems which is closed under permutation, any two algorithms will produce the same set of multiobjective samples. However, there are salient ways in which NFL does not generally hold in multiobjective optimization. Previously we have shown that a ‘free lunch’ can arise when comp...

متن کامل

Normative theories of argumentation: are some norms better than others?

Norms—that is, specifications of what we ought to do—play a critical role in the study of informal argumentation, as they do in studies of judgment, decisionmaking and reasoning more generally. Specifically, they guide a recurring theme: are people rational? Though rules and standards have been central to the study of reasoning, and behavior more generally, there has been little discussion with...

متن کامل

Choosing versus rejecting: why some options are both better and worse than others.

A previously unobserved pattern of choice behavior is predicted and corroborated. In line with the principle of compatibility, according to which the weighting of inputs is enhanced by their compatibility with output, the positive and negative dimensions of options (their pros and cons) are expected to loom larger when one is choosing and when one is rejecting, respectively. Subjects are presen...

متن کامل

Why are pro-poor exemption policies in Tanzania better implemented in some districts than in others?

BACKGROUND Like other African countries, Tanzania has in recent years, been implementing various exemptions and targeting programmes to protect and ensure equitable access to health care by poorer segments of the population. A body of evidence indicates that exemption policies, while potentially effective in principle, are ineffective in implementation. However, there is evidence that some dist...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

ژورنال

عنوان ژورنال: Frontiers for Young Minds

سال: 2021

ISSN: ['2296-6846']

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/frym.2021.597541